London Metropolitan Police contract lawsuit settled
Palantir and the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (Mopac) under London mayor Sadiq Khan have dropped their claims against each other, avoiding a High Court trial next January. A settlement is not a reinstated contract. The £50 million UOA contract remains cancelled, so this takes the heat out of a legal and reputational tail risk but is not a revenue positive.
Key evidence
- On 14 Oct Palantir and Mopac, the office of London mayor Sadiq Khan, dropped their claims against each other, avoiding the High Court trial scheduled for next January
- In June Palantir sued Mopac, accusing Khan of improperly obstructing, on the ground of a values mismatch, the award of the two-year, £50 million contract (UOA, the unified operational analysis system)
- Terms of the settlement: both sides stop suing each other and skip the trial, but the £50 million contract itself remains cancelled and has not been re-awarded
- The settlement came a month after Palantir hired former Labour deputy leader Tom Watson full time to lobby on its behalf
- Louis Mosley, head of the UK and Europe business, has consistently framed the matter as Khan politicising procurement and putting politics above public safety
- Together with the earlier disputes over the Met, EMSOU and the NHS, this eases but does not remove the thread of UK governance and reputational tail risk
Catalysts to watch
- Q3 results after the close on 2 Nov: NDR, net new customers, the gap between revenue and FDE numbers, SBC share
Risks
- The contract has not been re-awarded and does not count towards revenue
- This remains political friction and does not move the fundamentals
- The UK governance and reputational tail risk is eased, not removed
Sources 2
- Guardian, 14 Oct
- Bloomberg, 14 Oct
A brief is a lead for our research, not a verified conclusion or advice.